Home   FAQs Contact Refer A Friend Print
Search  
 
Water Quality / Pollution
 
Your are here : Home| Programme/projects|Water/Quality Pollution| NWMP
Global Environmental Monitoring Stations/ Monitoring of Indian National Aquatic Resource
 
Introduction

CPCB in collaboration with concerned SPCBs/PCCs established a nationwide network of water quality monitoring comprising 1019 stations in 27 States and 6 Union Territories. The monitoring is done on monthly or quarterly basis in surface waters and on half yearly basis in case of ground water. The monitoring network covers 200 Rivers, 60 Lakes, 5 Tanks, 3 Ponds, 3 Creeks, 13 Canals, 17 Drains and 321 Wells. Among the 1019 stations, 592 are on rivers, 65 on lakes, 17 on drains, 13 on canals, 5 on tanks, 3 on creeks, 3 on ponds and 321 are groundwater stations.

Presently the inland water quality-monitoring network is operated under a three-tier programme i.e. Global Environment Monitoring System (GEMS), Monitoring of Indian National Aquatic Resources System (MINARS) and Yamuna Action Plan (YAP). Water samples are being analysed for 28 parameters consisting of 9 core parameters, 19 other physico-chemical and bacteriological parameters apart from the field observations. Besides this, 9 trace metals and 22 pesticides are also analysed in selected samples. Biomonitoring is also carried out on specific locations. In view of limited resources, limited numbers of organic pollution related parameters are monitored i.e. micro pollutants (Toxic Metals & POPs) are analysed once in a year to assess the water quality. The water quality data are reported in Water Quality Status Year Book.

 
   
 
National Water Quality
Monitoring Network
National Water Quality at a Glance

The water quality data on rivers, lakes, ponds, tanks and groundwater locations being monitored under the network is evaluated against the water quality criteria and the monitoring locations in exceedence with respect to one or more parameters are identified as polluted, which requires action for restoration of water quality. The locations on rivers, lakes, ponds, tanks and groundwater not meeting the criteria are summarized ahead.

  • The Biochemical Oxygen demand (BOD), one of the most important indicators of pollution, was observed in Amlakhadi at Ankleshwar (714 mg/L) followed by Ghaggar at Moonak, Punjab (626 mg/l), Khari at Lali village, Ahmedabad (320 mg/L); Musi at Hyderabad (225 mg/L); Sabarmati at Ahmedabad (207 mg/L); Kalinadi at Kannuaj, UP (136 mg/L); Khan at Kabitkhedi, Indore, MP (120 mg/L); Damanganga d/s Daman at Kachigaon (112 mg/L); Kalinadi at D/s of Muzzafarnagar, U.P (110 mg/l), Saroonagar, Ranga Reddy Dist. A.P (71 mg/l), Gandigudem at Medak Dist. (60 mg/l), Hindon at Saharanpur (60 mg/L); Yamuna at Sonepat (59 mg/l), Krishna D/s of Islampur (40mg/l), Satluj D/s Hussainwala Firozpur, Punjab (40 mg/L); Bhima at Pune (36 mg/L); Elangabeel System point, Assam (64 mg/l), Bharalu at Guwahati, Assam (43 mg/L); Sukhna at Parwanoo Dist., Solan (36 mg/l), Chandola Lake at Ahemdabad (36 mg/l), Hussain Sagar Lake, Budamaru, A.P (33 mg/l), Dhadar at Kothada (32 mg/L), Bhaleshwar Khadi at N.H. No. 8 (27 mg/l), Gomti at Sitapur U/s (25 mg/l), Chambal at Dholpur (25 mg/l), Yamuna between Delhi and Etawah (10-59 mg/L) and Tapi at Uphad, Mahashtra (25 mg/L). Due to high BOD dissolved oxygen in these stretches was observed most of the time either nil or very low.
  • Total numbers of observations having BOD less than 3 mg/l, 3 to 6 mg/l and above 6 mg/l were 64%, 18% and 18%, respectively. The total number of observations having Total Coliform number less than 500 MPN/100 ml was 45%, between 500-5000 MPN/100 ml was 31% and exceeding 5000 MPN/100 ml was 24% MPN/100 ml. Similarly the number of observations having Faecal Coliform bacterial count less than 500 MPN/100 ml was 53%, between 500-5000 MPN/100 ml was 26% and 21% observations were exceeding 5000 MPN/100 ml.
  • Faecal Coliform another important indicator of pollution in India was found highest in Yamuna river in Agra, Nizamuddin, Mazawali and Okhla (MPN 5.2 x10 6 to 3.7x10 6 ) followed by Hindon after confluence with Krishni (1.1x10 6 to 4.6x10 5 ); Ganga at Dakshineshwar & Uluberia (1.1x10 6 to 2.8x10 5 ); Damodar at Haldia (1.4x10 6 ); Khari at Lali Village, Ahmedabad (7.5x10 5 ); Sabarmati at Ahmedabad (1.1x10 6 to 4.6x10 5 ); Bharalu at Gauhati, Assam (2.4x10 5 ); Ganga at Varanasi ((1.1x10 5 ); Satluj at Ludhiana (1.1x10 5 ); Tapi at Ukai (1.5x10 5 ); Kalinadi at Muzaffarnagar (3.1x10 5 ); Damanganga at Silvasa (1.2x10 6 ); and Brahamputra at Dhenukapahar & Pandu (2.4x10 5 );
Water Quality Trend

The water quality monitoring results obtained during 1995 to 2006 indicate that the organic and bacterial contamination are continued to be critical in water bodies. This is mainly due to discharge of domestic wastewater mostly in untreated form from the urban centres of the country. The municipal corporations at large are not able to treat increasing the load of municipal sewage flowing into water bodies without treatment.


Water Quality Trend
(BOD, mg/l)
Water Quality Trend (Total
Colliform, MPN/100 ml)
Water Quality Trend Faecal Colliform, MPN/100 ml)

Secondly the receiving water bodies also do not have adequate water for dilution. Therefore, the oxygen demand and bacterial pollution is increasing day by day. This is mainly responsible for water borne diseases.

The water quality monitoring results were analysed with respect to indicator of oxygen consuming substances (Bio-chemical demand) and indicator of pathogenic bacteria (total colliform and faecal colliform). The result of such analysis shows that there is gradual degradation in water quality. The number of observations having BOD and coliform density has increased during 1995 to 2006. The water quality status for the period 1995 to 2006 in terms of number of observations having values of parameters in different ranges are given in the figure 2 to figure 4.

The numbers of observed BOD values less than 3 mg/l were between 57-68% during year 1995 to 2006. The maximum value of 68% was observed during 2005. This shows that there is improvement in the water quality.

The number of observed BOD values ranges from 3-6 mg/l was between 17-28% during year 1995 to 2006, the maximum value of 28% was observed in the year 1998. It was observed that there was a gradual decrease in number of observations having BOD between 3-6 mg/l.

The numbers of observed BOD value> 6 mg/l were between 14 and 19% during year 1995-2006 and the maximum value of 19% was observed in the year 2001 and 2002. It was observed that there was a gradual decrease to 14% in 2005 and increase to 18% in 2006 in number of observations having BOD >6.

The numbers of observed TC values < 500 MPN/100 ml were between 44-63% during 1995-2006, the value gradually increases to 63% in year 1999 which decreases to 45% in 2006.

The numbers of observed TC values ranges from 500-5000 were between 28-37% during year 1995-2006 the maximum value of 37% was MPN/100 ml observed in 1997 and this % was gradually decreases to 33% in 2000 which further decreases to 31% in year 2006. It was also observed that there was a gradual decrease in no. of observations having TC < 500 MPN/100 ml.

The numbers of observed TC values > 5000 were between 9-24% during year 1995-2006. The maximum value of 24% was observed in the year 2006. Minimum value of 9% was observed during the year 1999.

The numbers of observed FC values <500 MPN/100 ml was between 48-67% during year 1995-2006. The maximum value of 67% was observed in the year 1998 that gradually decreases to 48% in 1999, which again steadily rose to 53% in 2006.

The numbers of observed FC values ranges from 500-5000 MPN/100 ml was between 22-35% during year 1995 to 2006. The maximum value of 35% was observed in the year 1999, which gradually decreases to 26% in the year 2006.

The numbers of observed FC values > 5000 MPN/100 ml was between 7-21% during year 1995-2006. The maximum value of 20% was observed in 2000, which gradually decreases to 12% in the year 2005 and further increases to 21% in 2006.

Water Quality trend of BOD in Rivers

The Water Quality trend of BOD in river Ganga, Yamuna, Sabarmati, Mahi, Tapi, Narmada, Godavari, Krishna, Cauvery, Mahanadi, Brahmani, Baitarni, Subernarekha, Brahmaputra, Satluj, Beas, Amlakhedi and Kali (East) depicting the data from 2002 to 2006 is presented in figure 5 to 22.

Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Ganga
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Yamuna
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Sabarmati
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Mahi
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Tapi
 
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Narmada
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Godavari
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Krishna
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Cauvery
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Mahanadi
 
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Brahmani
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Baitarni
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Subernarekha
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Brahmaputra
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Satluj
 
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Beas
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Amlakhedi
Water Quality Trend of
BOD in River Kali (East)